Showing posts with label hadith qudsi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hadith qudsi. Show all posts

Saturday, August 26, 2023

Sufi Reverberations - Episode 16 - What's In A Name?

 

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is once reported to have said: “There are 71 sects among Jews, and only one of them is correct. There are 72 sects among Christians, and only one of them is correct. There are 73 sects among Muslims, and only one of them is correct.” Presumably, something of a similar nature could be voiced concerning: Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, many kinds of indigenous systems of belief, as well as in relation to various modalities of the so-called mystery schools.

We all want to think that whatever path we are on is the right one. However I’m not going to try to claim that my spiritual journey just happens to be fully compliant with the correct one alluded to in the foregoing.

I have tried hard to search for the truth, but Allah knows best what the reality of my situation is. Nonetheless, I can say with certainty that whatever my shortcomings might still be – and I am sure that they are many -- my life is better than it otherwise would have been and become had it continued on the path I was on prior to becoming initiated, by the Grace of Allah, through my first shaykh.

On the other hand, as the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) has been reported to indicate: “The movements of nafs are more difficult to detect than the movements of a black ant on a smooth rock in the dead of night.” How much does one miss concerning the truth as a result of the machinations of nafs which through a network of desires, negative emotions, problematic motivations, and impulsive, ill-considered intentions constantly creates a variety of emotional, psychological, conceptual, social, and spiritual blind-spots, if not existential sink holes?

Plus, let’s add to the contributions of an individual’s nafs, the forces of dunya (which is the chaos generated by the manner in which the complex dynamics of our collective nafs interact with one another to generate a dysfunctional society) and, then, mix those dynamics with the constant entreaties of the shaytans that are urging human beings to pursue what is not in our best interests. Nafs, dunya, and shaytans are an unholy alliance constantly seeking to induce us to pursue things other than the truth concerning the essential nature of our relationship with Being, and if we are honest with ourselves, there are all too many times when we take a whipping from that alliance.

Even if we are fortunate enough, by the Grace of Allah, to win more of the foregoing battles than we lose, it has been said that the sins of the elect are the virtues of those who are less spiritually endowed. As a result, even if we believe we are doing well, this belief might only be because we have become intoxicated with a spiritual orientation which is nothing more than something which reverberates and resonates with the sins of the elect.

The foregoing consideration reminds one of the account that is associated with the life of Hazrat Ra’ bia (may Allah be pleased with her) who was reported to have been walking with a Sufi of some accomplishment on the side of a hill overlooking Basra. The latter individual looked upon the city below them and remarked that most of the people of that city did not keep their fasts or observe their prayers.

The man went on to indicate that he had never missed a fast or prayer in his life. Hazrat Ra’bia (may Allah be pleased with her) is reported to have given the man a hard look and said: “Thy existence is a sin with which none other can compare.”

There are those who maintain that the Sufi path is a sort of technology which entails a methodology which, if followed, leads to spiritual realization concerning, among other things, essential identity. Hazrat Bayazid Bistami (may Allah be pleased with him) indicates otherwise when he is reported to have said: “The Thing we tell of can never be found by seeking, but only seekers find it,” indicating that the sine qua none of the Sufi path is God’s Grace, for as the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: “Many are those among you who fast and, yet, gain nothing from it except hunger and thirst, and many are those who pray throughout the night and, yet, gain, nothing from it except wakefulness.” Presumably, one might add that there are many who give zakat but acquire nothing but a lessening of their bank account, or who go on Hajj and gain nothing but a trip, or who utter shahadah and gain only the sound of their own voice.

Irrespective of what one’s efforts might be, God is under no obligation to grant one spiritual realization. We are completely dependent on God’s Mercy for, as the Qur’an indicates: “O people, you are the poor towards God, and God is the Independent and Praiseworthy.” (35:15)

Whatever our rizq (or provision) might be, it is from Allah. We should be grateful for what comes to us, including the desire to seek the truth and worship the truths that are disclosed to us … whether these truths be simple or profound, and whether these truths come via ease or hardship.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: “All people are doomed to perish except those of action, and all people of action will perish except for the sincere, and the sincere are at great risk.” As the Qur’an reminds us: “We offered the trust to the heavens and the earth and the mountains, but they refused to bear it, being afraid thereof, and man accepted to bear it. He is, indeed, extremely oppressive and ignorant.” (33:72)  Again from the Qur’an: “And surely we shall test you with some fear and hunger and loss of wealth and lives and crops, but give glad tidings to the steadfast, who say when misfortune strikes them: surely to Allah we belong and to Allah we are returning.” (2: 155-156). Claims to sincerity will always be tested.

There are many people today – both within the Muslim and Christian communities – who talk about human beings having been created in the image of God. One should ask what the nature of an “image” is for it is neither God, nor other than God.

In one Hadith Qudsi – that is words which are uttered through the mouth of the Prophet, but which are said to be the words of God rather than those of a man and, yet, what is said does not constitute revelation – the following statement is reported to have been said: “In the beginning, I was alone, and I am now as I was in the beginning.” In another Hadith Qudsi, the following words were reported to have been said: “I am Ahmad without meem (m).“ In other words, God is Ahad.

Reflect on the foregoing. God is saying that God was alone in the beginning, and God is now as God was in the beginning. God is Ahad – the One, the Singular, the Only, the Alone.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is said to have cautioned people to: “Reflect upon all things but reflect not on God’s Essence.” The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is also reported to have said: “I have been given all the Names and have been sent to perfect good behavior.”

We can reflect on the Names – that is, we can reflect on all of the different levels of manifestation that are made possible by the way in which Nur, Divine Light, is defracted through the prism of the Names of Allah -- but we cannot reflect on the Essence or Dhat of God. The image of God is to be found in the Names and not in the Divine Essence for although in essence we human beings might be Divine, we are not Divinity in Essence. Indeed, as the Qur’an indicates: “God appointed for you stars that you might be guided in the darkness of the land and the sea.” (6:97) The Qur’an also states: “And God taught Adam all of the Names, then, showed them to the angels, saying: Inform me of the names of these, if ye are truthful. They said: Be glorified! We have no knowledge saving that which Thou hast taught us. Lo! Thou, only Thou, art the Knower, The Wise. God said: O Adam! Inform them of their names. God said: Did I not tell you that I know the secret of the heavens and the earth?” (2:31-33).

The Names of Divinity give active expression to the Divine Presence. Nonetheless, one cannot reduce the latter to the former, for if this were the case – that is, if the Names and Essence were identical -- then, to reflect on the Names (which is encouraged by God throughout the Qur’an) would be forbidden since, as stipulated earlier, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said that one should not reflect on the Divine Essence.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: “All of the Revealed Books are contained in the Qur’an. And, the meaning of the Qur’an is contained within Surah al-Fatihah. And, the meaning of Surah al-Fatiha is contained in Bismillah ir Rahman ir Raheem, and the meaning of Bismillah ir Rahman ir Raheem is contained in Bimillah, and the meaning of Bismillah is contained in the dot beneath bey (b).” Look for the image that gives expression to the fitra or essential nature of human beings in the dot beneath bey in Bismillah. Names are Names, but Essence is beyond all Names even as Names give testimony to the Presence of Essence or Dhat.

Earlier in this commentary, reference was made to my first shaykh. I have had two shaykhs – the first one was authentic and the second individual was a spiritual charlatan, and while the second “guide” might have been an imposter, nonetheless, he taught me some valuable lessons.

When my first shaykh passed away in 1988 I knew that I needed more guidance, and I knew that such an understanding of my unfinished spiritual condition was a sincere assessment of my condition. However, as indicated previously, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) has indicated that “the sincere are at great risk.” Part of that risk is that one’s intentions will be rigorously tested.

Although, by the Grace of Allah, this unworthy individual had been permitted to spend considerable time in the company of a true saint of the 20th century and, thereby, had been provided with numerous opportunities to serve God through him, nonetheless, following the passing away of my guide, I was prepared to start all over again if I were to be fortunate enough to find another shaykh. There were no expectations on my part that I would be entitled to be given some sort of spiritual intimacy with another shaykh as had been the case with my first spiritual guide. I was just ready to learn whatever I could.

After several false starts, my life was brought into contact with someone who – on the surface – seemed to be a genuine shaykh. That individual could quote a seemingly endless litany of appropriate Hadiths and Quranic passages at the time that circumstances appeared to call for such words, and, as well, he could speak authoritatively on the history of the Sufi tradition and offer an endless stream of anecdotes that brought different dimensions of the spiritual journey to the attention of those who listened to him. I report the foregoing in the manner that I have because I had been listening to my first shaykh for nearly sixteen years and could see how what the second shaykh was saying reflected – at least on the surface -- what the first shaykh had been saying, but words are like icebergs which have a small, visible portion that is rooted in a reality that lies beneath the surface and is capable of giving surface words an impetus that is a function of the properties and qualities of the kind of reality which lies beneath the surface of spoken words.

The second shaykh was charismatic, had a great sense of humor, and was very approachable. On a number of occasions, I witnessed the way the second shaykh was able to induce fundamentalist oriented individuals to alter their approach to Islam, and this transformation often took place within a matter of hours, if not sooner.

At a certain point, after having had the opportunity to listen to the second shaykh, ask him questions, and watch how he interacted with a wide variety of individuals under an array of circumstances, I sought initiation. Upon being initiated – and none of what follows had so much as been hinted to me prior to initiation – I was made a shaykh and informed about an important role that I was to serve in the West – a role that my new shaykh had been instructed about – allegedly -- by his own shaykh a number of years previously.

I began to give talks, initiate mureeds, and undertake different tasks that I was being assigned by my second shaykh in Canada, the United States, and England. There were other presumptive shaykhs in North America with whom I came in contact that appeared to acknowledge that my second shaykh was the real deal.

However, to make a longer story much shorter, after about a decade of service, I was exposed to incontrovertible evidence that the second shaykh who was referred to as Baba, or spiritual father, was engaged in an array of unacceptable behaviors which were destroying people’s lives – including my own life. Among other things, the individual was a sexual predator.

Some people who hear the foregoing might ask: “Well, if your first shaykh was authentic and a saint, why didn’t he step in and help you in some way.” In truth, such help was extended to me several times. Once was in the form of a dream in which my first shaykh came to me and told me that I was travelling in the wrong, spiritual direction.

However, while I was quite prepared to accept the idea that I was making mistakes and needed to do some sort of course correction, I chose to ask the wrong person about what the dream might mean in specific terms. In other words, I went to the second, physically living shaykh and mentioned the dream in which my previous shaykh had indicated that I was journeying in the wrong direction, and, of course, the individual to whom I told the dream was a master of spinning things and spin he did. As I reflect upon that incident and, by the Grace of Allah, having gained some emotional distance from that time, the irony of that set of circumstances has not been lost on me.

In addition, prior to the foregoing incident and before I came into contact with the individual who would turn out to be a spiritual charlatan, I also had been given another warning by my first shaykh – the one who had passed away. More specifically, there was a Sufi gathering that was taking place and at that gathering someone else who had been a mureed of my first shaykh indicated to me that he had had a dream in which our shaykh had instructed him to tell me to look out for two wolves.

I subsequently came in contact with a number of individuals who turned out to have the qualities of a wolf. Consequently, I had a little difficulty distinguishing between the wheat and the chaff when it came to identifying which of the people I met were the two wolves to which my first shaykh was trying to draw my attention. As a result, by the time I came into the company of the second shaykh, I thought – incorrectly – that I already had been exposed to, and managed to free myself from, individuals who seemed to fit the description of the sort of individuals about which my shaykh had warned me in the dream of a friend that had been conveyed to me.

Notwithstanding the foregoing missteps, and despite being a little slow on the uptake with respect to the understanding that was necessary to realize some of the truth of what was transpiring, I did come across the evidence that was needed to break free from the second, alleged shaykh -- the spiritual charlatan. Moreover, without going into details, the realization has gradually dawned on me over time that the spiritual charlatan had been trying to destroy me and my life for quite some time, including doing things behind my back that were intended to isolate me from my family and friends.

Although there have been many truths that, gradually, have surfaced as a result of those ten years in the spiritual desert, the learning process has been soaked with considerable pain. However, life is not just about the jamali names of Divinity – the names of ease, bounty, beauty, and mercy, because whether one likes it or not, life is also about being exposed to the jalali names as well – the names of rigor, severity, and hardship.

The aforementioned spiritual charlatan induced many people to lose their faith. Yet, irrespective of whatever role spiritual charlatans play in the lives of people, the choice of what one does with the events that come into one’s  life – whether on refers to them as being “good” or “bad” -- always belongs to the individual.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: “Knowledge is of two kinds: Formal knowledge which does not go beyond verbal profession. It is the evidence of God against those people who profess such knowledge, and according to it, God will judge them; and, genuine knowledge, which is deep rooted in the heart – this is the knowledge which is most useful.”

God has provided me with bits of genuine knowledge that were derived from the time I spent in the company of a real shaykh. God also has instilled genuine knowledge in me that arose, like a phoenix, from the ashes of my relationship with the false shaykh.

The Qur’an informs us that: “If Allah were to take humankind to task for their wrong-doing, God would not leave hereon a living creature, but God reprieveth them to an appointed term.” (16:61) I have tried to learn as much as I can about the nature of my own wrong-doing in the time that has been reprieved to me by God, and both of the aforementioned shaykhs, each in his own inimical way, has helped me to become aware of my mistakes and, slowly, with the help of Allah, I have sought to move in the direction of seeking to realize my fitra and away from ceding my agency to the influence of nafs, dunya, shaytans, and a false shaykh.

Back in the late 1960s, early 1970s, I remember coming across a book and a set of records by Baba Ram Das who, previously, had gone under the name: Richard Alpert. He, along with Timothy Leary, had been professors of psychology at Harvard when I was there, and during that time they both were fired from their jobs for experimenting with psilocybin as well as a few other consciousness-bending substances. A few years later Alpert wrote a book, accompanied by a set of records, called: Be Here, Now.

I had listened to the recordings and was quite moved by them, and, as a result, began to explore various mystical ideas and practices. My journey traversed a different path than his did, but, I tend to think that we both have been trying to move in the general direction of essential truths.

The series of words: “Be Here, Now” trips so easily off the lips, and, yet, to really understand what it is to “Be” and what the nature of the “Here” and the “Now” are, is profoundly difficult. The depth of the significance of that statement runs into the Unseen, for, as the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: “Truly, the Qur’an has an outward and an inward dimension, and so on up to seven dimensions,” and, therefore, to properly understand what is entailed by the notion of “Be Here, Now,” from a Sufi perspective, one would need to travel to the most inward dimension – the seventh level -- of the Qur’an … and, maybe, beyond.

As the Qur’an indicates: “… if all of the trees in the earth were pens, and the sea, with seven more seas to help it (were ink), the words of Allah could not be exhausted.” (31:27) Or, approached in another way, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: “God has seventy thousands veils of light and darkness; were they to be removed, the Glories of God’s face would burn away everything perceived by the sight of God’s creatures.”

We spend our lives sailing through the mysteries of those seventy thousand veils. We try to learn the intricacies of spiritual navigation that will enable us to find the way back to our essential selves and the truth of the nature of our relationship to the One Who has thrown us into the many currents of life.

At the beginning of this commentary, I referred to the Prophetic saying that includes the stipulation that: “there are 73 sects among Muslims, and only one of them is correct”. The considerations put forth throughout the present commentary allude to why there are so many paths that might be followed which will lead toward, or to, one of the 72 incorrect sects, and, how although the one correct way might be steeped in considerable mystery, yet, nonetheless, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) confirmed its reality when he is reported to have said: “There are hidden gems of knowledge unknown to all but those who know Allah. If they are spoken of, none denies them except those arrogant toward Allah.”

My first shaykh knew of such gems but was very guarded in his speech concerning them. My second shaykh – the spiritual fraud – did not know such gems but tried to speak as if he did, and, as a result, was thoroughly ensconced in one of the 72 incorrect ways of engaging Islam.

The present podcast will be my last in the Sufi Reverberations series – at least for the foreseeable future. I started these presentations not because I was a shaykh but because I wanted to share whatever I could that might offer a form of remembrance and support for whomever might happen onto the presentations while travelling through the darkness which is growing all about us. Indeed, as the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: “Verily, God doth not take away knowledge from the hands of Divine servants, but taketh it by taking away the learned, so that when no learned people remain, the ignorant will be placed at the head of affairs. Causes will be submitted to their decision, and they will pass sentence without knowledge, and they will err themselves, and lead others into error.” These are the times in which we live.

For those who are interested, I have written more than forty books on an array of topics, ranging from: Medicine, to: Evolution, the Sufi path, 9/11, spiritual abuse, Sam Harris, Tolstoy, Islam, shari’ah, education, quantum mechanics, cosmology, religion, constitutional issues, philosophy, psychology, sovereignty, and more. The books are all free for the taking and can be found at: https://billwhitehouse.com/press.htm . No e-mail addresses will be required, nor will donations be asked for. Take what you like and leave the rest.

If books are not your thing, then, there are some videos that might be of interest to you. These can be found at: https://billwhitehouse.com/video.htm -- the last two videos on the page might have the most value.

As-Salaam-u-‘alaykum and khuda hafiz. (What's In A Name)

 

Monday, August 18, 2008

Shari'ah: A Muslim's Declaration of Independence - Part 8

Various religious scholars, theologians, and mullahs want shari‘ah to cover commercial/economic, penal, real estate, contract, tort, inheritance, family, tax, government, and international law. However, none of these considerations – however important they may be under certain circumstances -- is the purpose of shari‘ah.

Naturally, to the extent that individuals realize the purpose of shari‘ah, then, the water drunk at the end of the road that is followed during the process of observing shari‘ah – both as a spiritual means and as a goal -- will have ramifications for all of the foregoing legal considerations. This is true with respect to the modes of equitability, as well as the quality of the character traits, through which people engage one another in their respective dealings. This also is true with respect to the manner in which a person who has responsibility for helping to arbitrate and mediate conflicts within a community is able to bring spiritual wisdom or insight to bear to assist people to come to harmonious solutions to such conflicts.

Nonetheless, shari‘ah is only for the individual. It is the individual’s path to truth, to reality, to the realization of fitra and essential identity, and, as such, shari‘ah is not a group path or legal journey … although, as indicated above, the realization of truth which, God willing, takes place, during the journey of shari‘ah does have ramifications for both group/social/community and juridical issues … but not in the sense which is usually believed to be the case.

Shari ‘ah cannot be forcibly imposed on anyone, nor can compulsory measures be used to impose such matters on others. Shari‘ah cannot be legislated, and when counsel is sought with respect to shari‘ah, one is not obligated to follow that counsel unless one’s heart resonates with what is being said or unless one’s heart resonates with the one who is offering the counsel, and, therefore, one has faith in the counsel being offered and provided that the counsel being offered does not induce one to impose that counsel on others or oppress others through such counsel.

Shari‘ah cannot be used as basis for institutional government of any kind. On the other hand, the fruits of pursuing and applying shari‘ah can benefit the manner through which public space is regulated.

The Prophet and the subsequent caliphs ruled in accordance with the truth to which shari‘ah opened them up. Nonetheless, their manner of regulating public space was not shari‘ah, per se.

During those early times, people who were not Muslim were not compelled to become Muslim or to act in accordance with Muslim spiritual traditions. Moreover, this absence of compulsion with respect to non-Muslims is the clearest indication possible that shari‘ah was neither compulsory, nor was it being imposed on communities, nor was it an integral part of the regulation of public space.

Rather, a public space or commons was being established through which people would have freedom of choice, as well as freedom from oppression, together with the promise of justice so that the opportunity to pursue shari‘ah in a peaceful manner would be available to everyone. Whatever laws were constructed with respect to commercial, penal, real estate, contract, tort, inheritance, family, and international issues were intended to serve no other purpose than to help establish a public space that was relatively peaceful, harmonious, and free from oppression of any kind and through which people would each, individually, have the opportunity to pursue [or not pursue] shari‘ah according to her or his individual choices.

Consequently, none of the foregoing sorts of laws concerning the regulation of public space carry any binding authority except to the extent that these arrangements give such substantial, demonstrable expression to principles of truth and justice that the people in the community are witnesses to the obvious benefit of those laws with respect to the manner in which they serve the public interest. Moreover, the public interest is served when an environment is created that is relatively free from oppression and injustice, as well as which gives people an array of degrees of freedom through which the members of that community may become committed to a rigorous seeking of truth and justice in all matters.

In the Qur’an, one finds the following guidance:

“No soul shall have imposed on it a duty but to the extent of its capacity.” [Qur’an, 2:233]

And again:

“We do not impose on any soul a duty except to the extent of its ability.” [Qur’an, 6:152]

And, again:

“And we do not lay on any soul a burden except to the extent of its ability. [Qur’an, 23:62]

And again:

“We do not impose on any soul a duty except to the extent of its ability.” [Qur’an, 7:42]

And, finally:

“Allah does not impose upon any soul a duty but to the extent of its ability; for it is (the benefit of) what it has earned and upon it (the evil of) what it has wrought: Our Lord! do not punish us if we forget or make a mistake; Our Lord! do not lay on us a burden as Thou did lay on those before us; Our Lord do not impose upon us that which we have not the strength to bear; and pardon us and grant us protection and have mercy on us; Thou art our Patron, so help us against the unbelieving people. [Qur’an, 2:286]

On five different occasions, the Qur’an confirms that Allah does not impose any burdens, duties, or obligations on an individual which are beyond the ability or capacity of a person. God knows what the capacity or ability of any given individual is, and Divinity does not exceed the limits inherent in those capacities.

As we, God willing, acquire more knowledge and come to gain a deeper understanding concerning our relationship with Allah, then, the nature of our spiritual status changes. As a result, there is more for which we can be held accountable as a function of such growth in understanding and knowledge, but this is a Divine accountability and not a human accountability as far as matters of Deen are concerned.

When human beings seek to impose shari‘ah – however construed – on others, such individuals are arrogating to themselves the status of Lordship. They are not only seeking to usurp God’s relationship with the individual, but they also are claiming – without any evidence -- that they know what the spiritual capacity of a given individual is.

In the process, limits are being transgressed. Allah sees the spiritual condition of human beings and knows what the limits of their capacities are, but theologians, jurists, imams, rulers, or legislators do not enjoy such a privileged position, and, therefore, they lack the knowledge and insight which would permit them to possess the wisdom to know what an individual’s God-determined limits are and act accordingly.

The Prophet was said to have spoken with people according to the level of understanding of the latter. Unfortunately, for the most part, the theologians and religious scholars of today tend to speak with people according to the level of understanding of the one who is doing the speaking – that is, the theologian or religious scholar – and, as such, lack all insight into the capacities, abilities, and levels of understanding of those being addressed.

The Prophet Muhammad is reported to have said: “What I have commanded you to do, perform it to the extent that you are able and refrain from what I have forbidden you to do.” [Bukhari, i‘tisam, 6; Muslim, fada’il, 130]

Here, again, there is an indication that shari‘ah is not a function of compulsion, nor is shari‘ah a matter of one size fitting all. The Prophet is alluding to the existence of differences in abilities and circumstances of various individuals, and those who are being addressed are being encouraged to comply with what has been said in accordance with what they are able to do rather than in accordance with what someone else – say a theologian, religious scholar, or the like -- expects such people to do.

“Each one does according to his rule of conduct, and thy Lord is best aware of the one whose way is right.” [Qur’an, 17: 84]

*******************

There is a Hadith Qudsi which says:

“I am according to the impression that My worshipper has of Me [that is, God] so let the impression of Me be Good.” [Bukhari, tawhid, 15]

Theologians, imams, muftis, and jurists often rule in accordance with their own opinions about God. As a result, they tend to be inclined to impose on others that which is in accordance with their impression of God.

Apparently, the impression which all too many Muslim theologians, jurists, muftis, and religious scholars seem to have of God is that Allah is: petty, small-minded, vindictive, unforgiving, intolerant, cruel, punitive, arbitrary, mean-spirited, lacking in wisdom, oppressive, and in desperate need of obedience. Such a poor impression seems to be the case because these sorts of qualities often are reflected in their fatwas, pronouncements, rulings, and writings concerning the illicit attempts of these sorts of individuals to impose shari‘ah on others, and one presumes that they are acting in accordance with what their impression of God indicates is expected of them by God.

The word ‘qadi’ often is translated as ‘judge’. However, such a translation really doesn’t properly reflect the actual role that a qadi should have.

A qadi – in its original sense and usage -- refers to one who helps settle or decide an affair (‘qada’). Nevertheless, this process of settling an affair is not a matter of imposing a judgment on the various parties to the affair under consideration.

A qadi is not trying to impose a perspective which is external to either the particulars of the situation being explored or the individuals who are seeking a just resolution to that situation. Rather, the task of, and challenge facing, a qadi is one of trying to assist individuals to navigate among an array of spiritual possibilities and work their collective way toward a destination which will be a harmonious solution for everyone involved – without necessarily knowing, in any predetermined manner, what the nature of such a destination will be or what that destination might look like at the beginning of the journey.

As such, a qadi is more of a resource person, facilitator, and a communicator than she or he is a judge of matters. The parties to a given conflict are helped by a qadi to explore the nature of that conflict in terms of its history, perceptions concerning that history, the nature of community and/or family, different needs of the parties to the conflict or affair, various character traits, the abilities of the individuals involved, and ideas concerning the nature of justice.

A qadi encourages the participants to address and discuss issues in such a way that the participants are the ones who learn how to struggle their way toward arriving at an understanding concerning how their affair or situation might best be resolved. The qadi guides this exploratory discussion in accordance with a principle voiced by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) – namely, “la darar wa la dirar”, which in today’s parlance might be translated as ‘do no harm’.

****************

In the Qur’an one finds the following ayat:

“And it does not beseem the believers that they should go forth all together; why should not then a company from every party from among them go forth they may apply themselves to obtain understanding of deen, and that they may warn their people when they come back to them that they may be cautious. [Qur’an 9:122]

Fiqh is related to the word: tafaqquh which means understanding and, in the context of the foregoing Quranic ayat, the understanding which is being sought concerns the nature of Deen.

Furthermore, such understanding is not something which is to be imposed on people. Rather, the previous Quranic ayat says that those who seek such understanding are to use the knowledge which is obtained in order to “warn their people” so that those people “may be cautious” concerning matters of Deen.

In addition, the Qur’an indicates:

“We have revealed [anzallna] to you al-zikr [The Qur’an] so that you may explain to people what has been brought down [nuzila] to them; and that they may reflect.” [Qur’an, 16:44]

Sharia‘ah is not necessarily a matter of telling people what to do – although this may be so in some instances. Instead, the Qur’an indicates that people are having things explained to them concerning the nature of revelation or remembrance, and, then, those individuals are being asked to reflect on that which is being explicated so that they may take what is being said and have it inform their own shari‘ah or journey/struggle toward the truth.

The process of understanding Deen – tafaqquh fil-din – requires one to struggle toward becoming open or receptive to the hukm of Deen – that is, its governing principle, reality, or truth – in any given set of circumstances. Hakim is one of the Divine Names and refers to the One Who determines the property of a given aspect of reality, and, therefore, the individual is seeking to become open to the nature of the truth or reality which Allah, through the agency of being Hakim, establishes as the governing authority or principle or reality of something in a given set of circumstances.

In this context, one often hears the term Usul al-fiqh. Fiqh, as already indicated, refers to the process of struggling to reach an understanding concerning the nature of the hukm or governing reality of Deen within various circumstances, and the term usul refers to the sources or principles one needs to understand in order to be in a position to be able to counsel or warn others with respect to the nature of Deen.

The principles and sources which are to be understood are all contained in the Qur’an. After all, God has “neglected nothing in the Book.” [Qur’an, 6:38]

Fiqh is the process of engaging the Qur’an for purposes of struggling toward the truth with respect to revelation or guidance. Fiqh is a search for right understanding, right belief, right character, right action, and right balance in the pursuit of doing justice to the truth or hukm of individual lived circumstances.

Each novel situation presents the practitioner of fiqh with possibilities and choices in relation to selecting that which may be right, good, just, and/or appropriate behavior to pursue with respect to that which, God willing, might be of most spiritual benefit to an individual or individuals in a given context. Fiqh is the process of seeking to come to an appropriate understanding of the hukm – or reality and governing principle or authority -- for a given set of circumstances, and, then, using that understanding to establish what are appropriate ways for proceeding through or conducting oneself in such circumstances.

A qadi seeks to induce the parties to a conflict to engage in the process of fiqh concerning the affair or conflict or issue which brought the various parties. Collectively, those individuals seek to struggle, with the assistance of the qadi, toward arriving at an understanding of the hukm – that is, the governing principle or reality – which has authority in the matter at hand.

For many, there is a sense in which life takes on the appearance of a judicial proceeding. For example, Muslims believe there is to be a Day of Judgment. We are further informed that what we do, and do not do, will be used as evidence -- both in support of, as well as being counted against, us -- and that our hands, feet, and other bodily members will give testimony concerning various matters on the Day of Judgment. Muslims also believe that punishments and rewards are associated with the manner in which evidence and judgment intersect with one another. Muslims further believe that a record of everything one does in life is being maintained and that each of us will carry such a record in either our right hand in front of us or our left hand behind us on the Day of Judgment.

Given considerations like the foregoing, when shari‘ah and Sacred Law are mentioned together, many people are inclined to jump to the conclusion that Sacred Law and shari‘ah must be matters which give expression to legal injunctions. Nevertheless, one can stipulate to the truth of ideas involving: the Day of Judgment, evidence, testimony, a real-time record, punishment, or reward, and, yet, still maintain that the Sacred Law and shari‘ah are not, ultimately, about judicial proceedings but, rather, are about truth, knowledge, understanding, spiritual realization, essential identity, and the process of purification which is necessary to, God willing, put a person in the position of being receptive to whatever God may wish to disclose to that individual concerning the nature of Sacred Law and the process of shari‘ah.

Life consists of a series of opportunities through which to purify ourselves. For example, the Qur’an says:

That person prospers who purifies oneself, invokes the name of one’s Lord, and prays.”
[Qur’an, 87: 14].

And, again:

But those will prosper who purify (tazakka) themselves and glorify the Name of their Guardian Lord and lift their hearts in prayer. [Qur’an, 87: 14-15]

And, again:

“Those who spend their wealth for increase in self-purification and Have in their minds no favor from anyone for which a reward is expected in return, but only the desire to seek for the Countenance of their Lord Most High.” [Qur’an, 92:18-20].

This last ayat in particular indicates that the purpose of purification is linked only to a “desire to seek for the Countenace of their Lord Most high” – without any thought of reward. This theme is echoed in another verse of the Qur’an:

“Say: Surely, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and death are all for Allah, the Lord of the worlds. [Qur’an, 6:162]

Or consider the following verses from Surah Shams [The Sun]:

In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.

I swear by the sun and its brilliance,

And the moon when it follows the sun,

And the day when it shows it,

And the night when it draws a veil over it,

And the heaven and Him Who made it,

And the earth and Him Who extended it,

And the soul and Him Who made it perfect,

Then He inspired it to understand what is right and wrong for it;

He will indeed be successful who purifies it,

And he will indeed fail who corrupts it. [Qur’an, 91:1-10]

According to my shaykh, the rhetorical style of the Qur’an is such that whenever God wishes to draw attention to the importance of some given point, theme, or issue, oaths are used to introduce such a point, theme, or issue. The more oaths there are which occur prior the matter in question, the more important is the issue to which our attention is being directed.

Nowhere else in the Qur’an does one find as many oaths piled upon oaths as one does with respect to the opening verses of Surah Shams. To what is our attention being drawn and what is so important? – the process of purification.

What does purification lead to if God wishes? Purification leads to taqwa.
And, why is taqwa important? Because the one who is in a condition of taqwa is the one who, God willing, shall be taught knowledge and discernment by God.

“Be Godfearing [have taqwa], and God will teach you [Qur’an, 2:282]

In other words, be careful with respect to one’s relationship with Allah. Understand that such a relationship is rooted in the hallowed, sacred ground of Being and that one must seek to gain insight into that ground, and if one exercises due diligence in these respects, then, God willing, one will be taught knowledge by God.

“If you are godfearing (have taqwa), He will give you discernment [furqanan].” [Qur’an, 8:29]

The process of developing an appropriate awareness and respect for the sacredness of Divine presence is a work or ‘amal . This struggle is a form of remembrance or zikr.

With respect to what is one to be given discernment or about what is one to be taught? One is to be taught about, and given discrimination concerning, the nature of Sacred Law and the process of shari‘ah.

One of the prayers of the Qur’an is”

“O my Lord, increase me in knowledge.” [Qur’an, 20: 114]

One is seeking knowledge of the truth concerning the nature of the Sacred Laws governing the Created Universe and one’s place in it. One is seeking knowledge about the nature of shari‘ah and how that process both leads to, as well as is an expression of, the Sacred Law. One is striving toward an understanding of the hukm which governs, and has authority over, this or that aspect of being – including one’s own essential identity and spiritual capacity.

The five pillars and zikr [both in their role as basic, fundamental expressions of shari‘ah that are intended to be accessible to all, as well as in conjunction with their role as supererogatory extensions of those basic fundamentals] are ways, God willing, of striving toward taqwa. The five pillars and zikr are processes of purification which, God willing, helps rid one of everything which can serve as a source of distraction, distortion, bias, and corruption concerning our achieving a state of receptivity – that is, taqwa – with respect to the real teachings of spirituality involving the Sacred Laws of the Created Universe.

The five pillars are not the end of matters, but are, rather, the beginning of a process that is intended to lead one to the place of drinking the water or knowledge which, God willing, renders one receptive to the hukm of God’s Word or revelation. Nonetheless, there are many gradations of knowledge and understanding concerning such matters.

The five pillars and zikr which are practiced by a Muslim are engaged through a different understanding than are the five pillars and zikr which are observed by a Momin or Mohsin. The five pillars and zikr of the one who is a condition of taqwa is different from those who are not in such a spiritual condition. The five pillars and zikr of an ‘abd of Allah is different from the five pillars and zikr of someone who is not an ‘abd of Allah.

“Whoever submits one’s whole self to Allah and is a doer of good has indeed grasped the most trustworthy handhold.” [Qur’an, 31:22]

And, as well:

“O Humankind! Surely you are toiling towards the Lord, painfully toiling, but you shall meet Him … you shall surely travel from stage to stage.” [Qur’an, 84: 6, 9]

*********************

Today, and for many centuries now, all too many Muslim religious scholars, theologians, imams, mullahs, and so on have sought to make the process of coming to a proper understanding of the nature of Sacred Law and shari‘ah an unnecessarily complex, convoluted, and a most difficult and contentious journey. According to such individuals, one must become familiar with some 1400 years worth of various people’s religious fatwas and theological meanderings, and/or one must become an apprentice with respect to some given madhhab or school of jurisprudence, and/or one must undertake to learn so many thousands of hadiths, and so on, before one can be said to be in a position to properly understand the nature of Sacred Law and shari‘ah.

However, the Qur’an says:

Allah does not desire to put on you any difficulty, but He wishes to purify you and that He may complete His favor on you, so that you may be grateful [Qur’an 5:6] -- ma yaridu Allahu li-ajala alaykum min haraj.

Shari‘ah is not a matter of intellectualized, rationalistic, or politicized engagements of the Qur’an. Shari‘ah is a process of purification entailing activities such as prayer, fasting, charitableness, pilgrimage, remembrance, service, worship, and the acquisition of character traits such as: gratitude, repentance, tolerance, perseverance, integrity, honesty, humility, nobility, forgiveness, patience, compassion, love, generosity, kindness, and so on – all of which will assist one to pursue shari’ah’s journey toward taqwa and, in turn -- if God wishes –to real, essential knowledge concerning both the nature of shari‘ah and the Sacred Law governing Created existence.

One pursues these activities as best one’s circumstances permit and according to one’s capacity to do so. To demand that more than this be done or to demand that people pursue this in accordance with someone’s theological interpretation of matters is to impose an oppressive difficulty on people, and, yet, this is precisely what all too many Muslim theologians, mullahs, and religious scholars would do when they claim that people must be made to act in accordance with those people’s arbitrary ideas concerning the nature of shari‘ah and the Sacred Law.

“And God wishes for you that which is easy, not what is difficult.” [Qur’an, 2:185]

That which is easy is not necessarily that which is without struggle. Rather, that which is easy is that which falls within one’s capacity to accomplish if one makes efforts in this regard and if God supports such efforts.

Through the process of purification, God is seeking to assist us to simplify our lives. In other words, God is wishing for us to have ease – at least as much as this is possible in this life – rather than difficulty.

When everything we do is distorted, filtered, framed, and corrupted by our biases, delusions, and false understandings, life becomes very difficult – much more difficult than it has to be. However, through the process of purification – that is, through the journey of shari‘ah -- one begins, God willing, to not only shed all the unnecessary conceptual and emotional baggage which we impose upon ourselves through our biases and false understanding concerning the nature of reality and ourselves, but, as well, one is brought to a station of taqwa where one is taught the kind of knowledge and discrimination by God which helps ease us through the ups and downs of lived existence.

********************